Just In
- 47 min ago iQOO Z9 Turbo Launched in China: Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, 16GB RAM, and More
- 1 hr ago iQOO Z9, Z9x Launched in China: 6000mAh Battery, iQOO 12 Inspired Design, 50MP Camera, & More
- 2 hrs ago HMD Branded First Set of Android Smartphones Are Here!
- 3 hrs ago OnePlus 13 New Leak Reveals Display and Camera Details; What to Expect?
Don't Miss
- Finance No Onboarding Of New Customers Via Online, Mobile Banking From April 24 At Kotak Bank; RBI Issues Ban
- Sports Most Runs in IPL 2024, Orange Cap Holder: Top 10 Highest Run Scorers And Team-wise Top 5 Batters On April 24
- Movies Dance Deewane 4: Karisma Kapoor Gives Epic Reaction Witnessing Little Contestant’s On-point Expressions, Watch
- News INDIA Bloc's One Year-One PM Formula Will Destroy Country: PM Modi
- Education MP Board Class 10th, 12th Results 2024, Know Alternative Ways to Check Your Result
- Automobiles Aston Martin Vantage Launched In India At Rs 3.99 Crore
- Travel Mumbai Opens BMC Headquarters For Exclusive Heritage Tour
- Lifestyle Summer Style: 6 Must-Try Colors To Stay Fashionably Cool Like B-Town Divas!
Freedom 251 handset maker explains why the company failed to deliver the smartphones
Freedom 251 handset maker has said that if he gets support from the government, he can still deliver the handsets by March-April next year.
Mohit Goel, the maker of the controversial "Freedom 251" smartphone which became the talk of the town last year, resurfaced on Sunday, saying that if he gets support from the government, he can still deliver the handsets by March-April next year.
Police on Sunday arrested two persons after Goel, Managing Director of Noida-based Ringing Bells Pvt Ltd which launched the world's cheapest smartphone last year, filed an FIR against them for not delivering "Freedom 251" units even after the company paid them in advance.
The accused Vikas Sharma, 35, and Jeetu, 40, both residents of Delhi, who allegedly took nearly Rs 3.5 crore from Ringing Bells for delivering handsets, were sent to Dasna jail, Noida's Superintendent of Police, City, Arun Kumar Singh told IANS.
Speaking to IANS over phone, Goel said, "I paid the duo nearly Rs 3.5 crore and, in return, they cheated me. They siphoned off the money and did not deliver any phone. In February this year, some distributors filed a case against me and I was jailed for six months. Now with the fresh arrests, people will come to know why I failed to deliver on my promise."
Goel lamented that the government did not come to his support despite his commitment to 'Make in India' and 'Start-up India' initiative by providing every single Indian citizen with a smartphone.
"The big players today have adopted my model and are now giving smartphones in as low as Rs 1,300, like Karbonn. The Jio model for paying Rs 1,500 in advance for a smartphone is similar. They have deep pockets so they can afford but why don't people ask them how they are making smartphones so cheap?" he said.
"My vendors didn't deliver on time and I failed. Our company's President Ashok Chadda is still languishing in jail. I need one opportunity to come back clean and provide people handsets by March-April next year," Goel told IANS, adding that he is not planning anything else at the moment but to focus on his "Freedom 251" dream.
The company in mid-February 2016 had planned to deliver 2.5 million handsets before June 30, the same year. Ringing Bells received mammoth -- over 70 million-- registrations before its payment gateway crashed.
The world's cheapest phone made a splash across the globe, with almost every big media house writing about the "miracle device".
After announcing that it had delivered 5,000 'Freedom 251' smartphones to customers in July last year, Ringing Bells said it would deliver 65,000 more to those who had booked the device in cash on delivery (COD) mode.
But no new numbers were shared afterward.
Goel was arrested in February this year after an FIR was filed by Ghaziabad-based distributor Ayam Enterprises, alleging that Ringing Bells defrauded it of Rs 16 lakh.
The Allahabad High Court later granted bail to Goel. The court had observed that a compromise was agreed upon between the parties involved in the case.
Source: IANS
-
99,999
-
1,29,999
-
69,999
-
41,999
-
64,999
-
99,999
-
29,999
-
63,999
-
39,999
-
1,56,900
-
79,900
-
1,39,900
-
1,29,900
-
65,900
-
1,56,900
-
1,30,990
-
76,990
-
16,499
-
30,700
-
12,999
-
11,999
-
16,026
-
14,248
-
14,466
-
26,634
-
18,800
-
62,425
-
1,15,909
-
93,635
-
75,804