Just In
- 5 hrs ago Elon Musk’s X Is Launching a TV App Similar to YouTube for Watching Videos
- 7 hrs ago Qualcomm Reveals Snapdragon X Plus Chip for Laptops: 10 Core CPU, On-Device AI, & Much More
- 7 hrs ago Flipkart Teases “Jaw-Dropping” Discount on iPhone 15: All-Time Low Price Anticipated
- 7 hrs ago President Joe Biden Signs Bill to Ban TikTok in the US: Unless This One Condition is Met
Don't Miss
- Movies Truth Behind Shruti Haasan & Santanu Hazarika's Break Up; Duo Living Separately After Unfollowing Each Other?
- Finance 1:5 & 1:2 Split, Rs 6/Sh Dividend: Fertilizer Stock Coming Up With 600% Payout; Record, Payment Dates Fixed
- Sports SRH vs RCB: 'Statpadder' Virat Kohli faces Fans Wrath after 118.3 Strike Rate
- News Delhi Mayoral Polls Postponed Due To CM's Detention, LG Raises Appointment Concerns
- Automobiles Royal Enfield Unveils Revolutionary Rentals & Tours Service: Check Out All Details Here
- Education AICTE introduces career portal for 3 million students, offering fully-sponsored trip to Silicon Valley
- Lifestyle Heeramandi Screening: Alia Bhatt, Ananya Panday, Rashmika Mandanna And Others Serve Finest Ethnic Style!
- Travel Escape to Kalimpong, Gangtok, and Darjeeling with IRCTC's Tour Package; Check Itinerary
Google, Facebook: Impossible to pre-screen the content
Google and Facebook mentioned to the Delhi court that they are not able to filter the content that are posted on their sites as they cannot stop the users from posting on their profiles. They also expressed that the social networking websites are the platform for the users to speak and express freely.
The advocate who represented Google, Neeraj Kishan said that it is easy for others to ask us to use filters but the practical implementation is quite difficult. If we have to block the word sex then the data containing the word in ration cards, passports and other important documents also get blocked. It is very difficult to analyze the context and then block or allow the word.
Both these companies are among the 21 of them whose executives are summoned to appear for the trail court on March 13th 2012 as they are accused for hosting objectionable and obscene content.
Google claims that it is a search engine and the ownership of the offending material belongs to the website and not Google.
The Delhi court summoned about 21 companies in December 2011 as they were found hosting obscene depictions of Hindu deities, Jesus Christ and Prophet Mohammed thereby affecting the religious believes of the people.
Read out article on Indian courts summon Internet firms.
-
99,999
-
1,29,999
-
69,999
-
41,999
-
64,999
-
99,999
-
29,999
-
63,999
-
39,999
-
1,56,900
-
79,900
-
1,39,900
-
1,29,900
-
65,900
-
1,56,900
-
1,30,990
-
76,990
-
16,499
-
30,700
-
12,999
-
11,999
-
16,026
-
14,248
-
14,466
-
26,634
-
18,800
-
62,425
-
1,15,909
-
93,635
-
75,804